SEO for the Clueless

Posted on 08. Aug, 2009 by combimish in SEO

Any occu­pa­tion boasts par­tic­u­lar prac­tices, prin­ci­ples, and jar­gon that appear totally opaque to those not in the know. Search engine opti­miza­tion is no excep­tion. If you’re clue­less about SEO, or find as an SEO that you some­times need to explain what you do, and why, to clients or at cock­tail par­ties, keep read­ing.
A con­ver­sa­tion with a reader who under­stood that he needed to do some­thing to make his site stand out in Google, but didn’t know what, drove home to me just how much we talk in a way that oth­ers don’t nec­es­sar­ily under­stand. It’s not their fault; whether you real­ize it or not, as an SEO you deal with highly tech­ni­cal con­cepts every day. If you’re try­ing to help some­one with their sim­ple mom-and-pop web­site, you’re prob­a­bly intro­duc­ing them to these ideas for the first time. Even the own­ers of larger e-commerce sites aren’t immune to this kind of ignorance.

If it helps, here are two points to keep in mind. First, igno­rance is cur­able. Sec­ond, who­ever you’re help­ing prob­a­bly knows far more about their own prod­uct or field of exper­tise than you do – so they’re clearly not stu­pid. They’ll catch on bet­ter to what you’re try­ing to explain if you gen­tly prod to see how much they know about the way search engines, web sites and the Inter­net work, and then build up slowly from that basis.

At this point, if you’re an expe­ri­enced SEO, you may be won­der­ing if it’s worth the effort. If the client already knows they need help to opti­mize their web site, and they’re will­ing to hire you, does it really mat­ter how much they under­stand about the actual process of SEO? In a word, yes. If they under­stand how the process works, they’ll under­stand why you need to do what you’re going to do to their web site – which is, for most peo­ple, their “baby.” Fur­ther­more, they’ll under­stand why it’s an ongo­ing process, not some­thing you can do just once and be done with it. They’ll coop­er­ate more with you, bring­ing their own knowl­edge to bear while respect­ing yours – and that kind of help is priceless.

Now, if you’re one of those peo­ple who knows that search engine opti­miza­tion is impor­tant, but feels over­whelmed when you encounter the jar­gon or the bil­lions of details that all seem to be of life-or-death impor­tance when it comes to your web site, you’re prob­a­bly won­der­ing when I’m going to talk to you. Well, guess what? The rest of this arti­cle is addressed to you. So we’re going to step back from all of the details sur­round­ing SEO, and start with the very rea­son for its exis­tence – which is con­tained in the first two words of the field.

Quite some time ago I wrote an arti­cle explain­ing how search engines work (and some­times don’t). I won’t rehash it here. Briefly, search engines use com­puter pro­grams to try to deter­mine what a web page is “about.” If the Inter­net is a thick, schol­arly book, a search engine is the index at the back of the book. If you look for “book­cases and book­shelves” in the book’s index, that’s akin to putting those terms in the search engine – and the page num­bers given are like the search engine’s hyperlinks. 

But com­puter pro­grams aren’t quite like humans when it comes to cre­at­ing indexes. They don’t really under­stand the mean­ing of words – at least, not yet. That’s the genius of Google. In a sense, it har­nesses mil­lions of humans to do its work. Google’s algo­rithms can under­stand that when a web site – or more pre­cisely, the human behind the web site – links out to another page, it’s a state­ment that the page being linked to is rel­e­vant to what is being talked about. SEOs and search engi­neers often describe this by say­ing that a link to a site is a “vote” for that site. I’ll be talk­ing more about this from a slightly dif­fer­ent per­spec­tive in the last sec­tion of this article.

While search engines have trou­ble under­stand­ing the mean­ing of words, they’re per­fectly capa­ble of see­ing what words are used as part of the link. So if I wrote “I love the vari­ety of ice cream offered by Ben and Jerry’s,” and attached a hyper­link to the Ben and Jerry’s web site on those last three words, the search engine would know that the phrase “Ben and Jerry’s” is rel­e­vant to that site. Going fur­ther, the search engine might notice that I men­tioned “ice cream” and “vari­ety” in the same sen­tence, and think that those words are rel­e­vant to the Ben and Jerry’s web site as well. So when you put the phrase “Ben and Jerry’s” or per­haps “ice cream vari­ety” into Google’s search box, Ben and Jerry’s web site might turn up near the top of the search results.

This is a mas­sive over­sim­pli­fi­ca­tion, but it gives you at least some idea of what is going on. The num­ber of fac­tors Google actu­ally checks to decide where to list a web page for any par­tic­u­lar search term may be any­where from 50 to 200, depend­ing on who you ask. The cru­cial thing to remem­ber, though, is that Google is mea­sur­ing what humans are telling it. So if you want to do well in Google, you need to pro­vide some­thing that humans want – some­thing that they’ll search for and tell other peo­ple about.

Search engine opti­miza­tion as a field sprang up when search engines started get­ting more and more effec­tive at help­ing users to find what they were search­ing for on the Inter­net – and every time you use a search engine to find some­thing online, you val­i­date the field’s exis­tence. The whole point of SEO is to help your web pages rank high in the search engines for terms that are rel­e­vant to your site. This is not the only way to attract vis­i­tors to your site, but it is the path that many (if not most) web sites take. 

Tra­di­tion­ally, SEO has been divided into two fla­vors: on-page opti­miza­tion and off-page opti­miza­tion. I’ll dis­cuss off-page opti­miza­tion in the next sec­tion. On-page opti­miza­tion deals with every­thing you do on your web page. When I use the phrase “web page,” I’m talk­ing not just about what some­one sees through a browser, but also the for­mat­ting and the code behind the page.

Web browsers are set up to read a spe­cial lan­guage called HTML. HTML stands for Hyper Text Markup Lan­guage. HTML sim­ply tells the browser that cer­tain parts of pages are to be treated in par­tic­u­lar ways, so when a vis­i­tor views the page, the infor­ma­tion on it will be dis­played in par­tic­u­lar ways. Things like the num­ber of columns, tables, back­ground and text col­ors, and pretty much every­thing you see on a web page, is con­trolled by HTML. (Again, that’s an over­sim­pli­fi­ca­tion, but you get the point). 

HTML also con­trols things like page head­ers, foot­ers, sec­tion head­ings, and the like. When a search engine spi­der vis­its a web page to index it, it can read the HTML well enough to tell that cer­tain words are in parts of the page that a reader would con­sider more impor­tant – like the title of an arti­cle or a sec­tion head­ing. So if a spi­der sees that the title of an arti­cle on a web site is “Mak­ing Fruit-Flavored Ice Cream,” it would fig­ure that these words are very rel­e­vant to the article. 

Not every­thing a pro­gram­mer puts in a page’s HTML will be vis­i­ble to a site vis­i­tor. But some of it will be vis­i­ble to the spi­der. For exam­ple, your page’s title shows up above the address bar in a browser – and also in the results pages of the search engine. But when a vis­i­tor is on your page, he or she will be read­ing your con­tent. Yet a search engine will know that the title, enclosed by title tags in HTML, con­tains words that are rel­e­vant to your web page. 

Just as search engines know that words located in the title and sec­tion head­ings of a web page indi­cate what’s impor­tant to that page’s topic, they also know that items located in other sec­tions of a web page are less impor­tant. For exam­ple, busi­nesses often include a copy­right notice or links to con­tact infor­ma­tion in the footer of every web page. A com­pany sell­ing an ice cream maker might have a page of recipes titled “Ice Cream Recipes for the Dream Machine” with their com­pany address in the footer. When it comes to the page’s con­tent, it’s the recipes that are impor­tant and rel­e­vant, not the com­pany address – and that’s how the search engines see it as well.

There’s a lot more to on-page opti­miza­tion than I’ve described here. The job of an SEO demands atten­tion to all kinds of details. But I’ve hope­fully given you some idea of the prin­ci­ples behind on-page optimization.

The term “off-page opti­miza­tion” cov­ers every­thing that tells the search engines what is impor­tant and rel­e­vant to your page, but isn’t directly on the page. The major­ity of off-page opti­miza­tion, then, is con­cerned with build­ing links to a page. Link build­ing is per­haps the most chal­leng­ing part of SEO.

Unfor­tu­nately, it’s also one of the most impor­tant. Search engine algo­rithms give more weight to links when try­ing to deter­mine a page’s topic, and its rel­e­vance to that topic, than any­thing else. But not all links are cre­ated equal.

When Google first came out, it based its search results on the idea that every time a web site linked to another web site, it amounted to the link­ing web site cast­ing a vote for the linked-to web site. When the link­ing web site used par­tic­u­lar text in the link, Google’s algo­rithm decided that the web site being linked to must be rel­e­vant to that text. This turned out to be some­what rev­o­lu­tion­ary, and it’s why Google gives such good results today.

For exam­ple, if I wrote some­thing like “My favorite SEO forum keeps me up-to-date on all the lat­est tech­niques,” Google would fig­ure that the web site I linked to has some­thing to do with SEO forums…and if some­one searched Google with the key word “SEO forum,” that link would count as a vote say­ing that the site is rel­e­vant for that search.

Now here’s the prob­lem: back then, Google’s algo­rithm seemed to count all votes equally, so SEOs quickly learned how to game the sys­tem to get their sites to the top of search engine results for their cho­sen key­words. Google, of course, coun­ter­at­tacked by tweak­ing its algo­rithms. Links still mat­ter a great deal, but there’s more of an empha­sis on the qual­ity of the site link­ing to you, and the qual­ity of the link itself. 

Now let’s talk a lit­tle bit about how on-page and off-page fac­tors relate to each other. If you put up fresh con­tent on a reg­u­lar basis, such as by writ­ing a blog, that’s an on-page fac­tor – and one of the points that Google is known to look at when rank­ing a web site is how fre­quently it posts fresh con­tent. If you write a post that lots of peo­ple read and link to, those links are an off-page fac­tor. If you delib­er­ately wrote a post that you hoped would get a lot of links, and you worked very hard on it, and you did in fact get a lot of links, that’s called “linkbait.” 

The idea of writ­ing linkbait has grown with the advent of social web sites. I’m talk­ing about places like Slash­dot, Fark, Search­les, and oth­ers, whose whole point of exis­tence seems to be link­ing their mem­bers to fun and inter­est­ing con­tent. Social media like this changed the game of SEO once again; some abused this new way to get atten­tion for their web site, while oth­ers learned how to use it care­fully and effectively. 

Every time the Inter­net changes dra­mat­i­cally, it affects SEO. Is it any won­der that this seems like such a crazy field? And yet, it comes down to the basics of mar­ket­ing and busi­ness: give the cus­tomer what they want. It’s find­ing out what they want, mak­ing sure you have it, and get­ting the word out that you do have it with­out annoy­ing any­body, that’s the chal­lenge. Now there is much more to search engine opti­miza­tion than I’ve cov­ered here, of course. I hope, how­ever, that I’ve given you a basic idea of what SEO involves. At the very least, you can point your friends, fam­ily, poten­tial clients, and curi­ous cock­tail party atten­dees here. 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BarraPunto
  • Bitacoras.com
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • blogtercimlap
  • co.mments
  • Diigo
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Fleck
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Live
  • NewsVine
  • Turn this article into a PDF!
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Wikio IT
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Fark

Related Posts:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a reply